I am not currently active on this blog for several important reasons. I have not had a moment to even consider writing what God has put in my heart to place on this page. I have been writing it down, but not taking the time to fill it all out just yet.
After October the first, I will return to actively writing on this page. Until then, I think the following link is important enough for all of us to read and ponder, for the message is crystal clear and extremely important.
The point is at the end, and believe me this is an excellent example of the meaning of service.
God Bless
Place a copy of this link in your web browser. It will take only a few minutes to read.
http://www.eielson.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123111092
Monday, September 22, 2008
Wednesday, August 27, 2008
Today has been a good day...
I went to work, taught my classes, and came home. I have talked with my daughter about a pet turtle, and even went to PETCO to look at several. She really wants a pet to take care of.
I have prayed today, and God was never far from my mind. Even though I was talking about thermodynamics and other physics-like subjects with students, my mind was not really altogether on my subject matter.
I did not really notice the time that went by today. It seemed to be a hazy experience, like being in the Dentist chair breathing gas- you go through all the motions and even respond correctly to questions, but the experience seems insular. I know I talked to students, and even gave advice on changing classes for a student.
Nothing today was different from yesterday, except that my mind has been working without my permission on a different problem. A different drum beat is sounding in my ears today. My heart has been changed somehow without a good medical reason.
Yesterday, I spent the afternoon going to a facility that cares for the elderly and the infirm.
I helped with the Nursing Home ministry Sunday afternoon, and I met a few people. We sang songs, and I spoke for a few minutes about the salvation brought to man by God that, even though the heavens and Earth would pass away, would never be abolished. Then I spoke about the need for salvation and how salvation can be had easily through obedience to the Word of God. After telling the group about Peter’s instructions for salvation, we closed the service.
Afterward, a man sitting in the very back asked to be baptized. We talked with him, and as he was very elderly, carefully explained repentance and baptism to him. He insisted that he needed to be baptized.
So, yesterday the Pastor and I checked this man out of the facility, brought him to the church and baptized him in Jesus Name.
This gentleman is very aged, and suffering from senility to a degree. He was a helpless individual with no future to speak of. He could not dress himself or get around. Carrying on a conversation was difficult. His time left on Earth may be short. Yet he adamantly wanted to be baptized. He said he wanted all that God had for him.
As he went down in the water, he was focused on the process of holding his nose and breath. When he came out of the water, there was a pronounced change in the look of his countenance and he was emotionally stirred. He said “in the name of Jesus”. He was so happy, and quietly went with me back to the car for the ride back to the home. When I witnessed the change in this man, at the same moment a change occurred in me also.
He listened and obeyed the Word, just as a small child would. He simply accepted what he heard and obeyed.
I have had a good day not because everything is the same, but because everything is different.
I have constantly wondered how this man has been faring, and how the other residents are doing at the nursing home. I have stopped several times today and asked God to care for this man and his needs. I wonder right now how he has done today. I have known this man a total of 48 hours.
What, you may ask, is so profound?
God has answered a prayer today.
My heart is totally changed, completely switched around. I have not worried about work or bills or even food. But I have constantly been thinking about how our newest convert is faring. How the folks at the home are doing.
You might be curious about my mental state right now, but I am fine. Never better.
You see, I have been praying that God would open my heart and fill it with compassion and care for the lost as much as possible. I asked Him to let me “see with His eyes” when I look at people. Just one time, just so I can sense the need of people and feel a small portion of the love that God gives to us.
I now realize that God allowed me to meet this fellow at the nursing home, and help get him to the church, and He let me see the change in his life in order to let me “see”. It has taken me a day to figure it out, but there is no doubt. I cannot shake the feeling in my heart. I cannot get the image of that change in the face of this man out of my mind. I feel such an intense desire to go back and talk to each one of those folks in the home. To find out how they are doing. Is all well with them today?
I think I know to a small degree how God sees a lost soul, and how He is concerned. A small measure no doubt, but enough. I am changed forever.
I have prayed today, and God was never far from my mind. Even though I was talking about thermodynamics and other physics-like subjects with students, my mind was not really altogether on my subject matter.
I did not really notice the time that went by today. It seemed to be a hazy experience, like being in the Dentist chair breathing gas- you go through all the motions and even respond correctly to questions, but the experience seems insular. I know I talked to students, and even gave advice on changing classes for a student.
Nothing today was different from yesterday, except that my mind has been working without my permission on a different problem. A different drum beat is sounding in my ears today. My heart has been changed somehow without a good medical reason.
Yesterday, I spent the afternoon going to a facility that cares for the elderly and the infirm.
I helped with the Nursing Home ministry Sunday afternoon, and I met a few people. We sang songs, and I spoke for a few minutes about the salvation brought to man by God that, even though the heavens and Earth would pass away, would never be abolished. Then I spoke about the need for salvation and how salvation can be had easily through obedience to the Word of God. After telling the group about Peter’s instructions for salvation, we closed the service.
Afterward, a man sitting in the very back asked to be baptized. We talked with him, and as he was very elderly, carefully explained repentance and baptism to him. He insisted that he needed to be baptized.
So, yesterday the Pastor and I checked this man out of the facility, brought him to the church and baptized him in Jesus Name.
This gentleman is very aged, and suffering from senility to a degree. He was a helpless individual with no future to speak of. He could not dress himself or get around. Carrying on a conversation was difficult. His time left on Earth may be short. Yet he adamantly wanted to be baptized. He said he wanted all that God had for him.
As he went down in the water, he was focused on the process of holding his nose and breath. When he came out of the water, there was a pronounced change in the look of his countenance and he was emotionally stirred. He said “in the name of Jesus”. He was so happy, and quietly went with me back to the car for the ride back to the home. When I witnessed the change in this man, at the same moment a change occurred in me also.
He listened and obeyed the Word, just as a small child would. He simply accepted what he heard and obeyed.
I have had a good day not because everything is the same, but because everything is different.
I have constantly wondered how this man has been faring, and how the other residents are doing at the nursing home. I have stopped several times today and asked God to care for this man and his needs. I wonder right now how he has done today. I have known this man a total of 48 hours.
What, you may ask, is so profound?
God has answered a prayer today.
My heart is totally changed, completely switched around. I have not worried about work or bills or even food. But I have constantly been thinking about how our newest convert is faring. How the folks at the home are doing.
You might be curious about my mental state right now, but I am fine. Never better.
You see, I have been praying that God would open my heart and fill it with compassion and care for the lost as much as possible. I asked Him to let me “see with His eyes” when I look at people. Just one time, just so I can sense the need of people and feel a small portion of the love that God gives to us.
I now realize that God allowed me to meet this fellow at the nursing home, and help get him to the church, and He let me see the change in his life in order to let me “see”. It has taken me a day to figure it out, but there is no doubt. I cannot shake the feeling in my heart. I cannot get the image of that change in the face of this man out of my mind. I feel such an intense desire to go back and talk to each one of those folks in the home. To find out how they are doing. Is all well with them today?
I think I know to a small degree how God sees a lost soul, and how He is concerned. A small measure no doubt, but enough. I am changed forever.
Labels:
Baptism in Jesus Name,
Ministry,
Nursing Home
Tuesday, August 19, 2008
Strength from Weakness. Unity from Diversity.
As I sit here tonight thinking about the kingdom of God and my opportunity to be in it, I have decided that there is a strange connection between me and everyone else in the kingdom with me.
Consider that each of us is so different. I am a small person with a small life; I am not powerful or terribly skilled and I have no inheritance on this Earth. I am limited in thinking ability and vision; even though I have tried to expand my horizons, I am terribly limited.
I look to my left or right and I see similar people, entirely similar yet different. We all hail from wildly different backgrounds and have tasted defeat and shame and maybe only a little success as far as our society would estimate. Many of us have had the test of time upon us and have failing parts connected in the same fashion, while others have yet to taste time and run around with boundless energy with no particularly useful point in mind.
I have skin of a particular type, while my brother standing next to me has another type. He likes certain types of food, and I appreciate another. My musical tastes are not really quite like yours, I am certain. In the workplace this demographic can lead to small and isolated groups who do not work effectively.
So what is it that makes me want to find my place next to you in a worship service, work along side you in the Spanish ministry, toil to help in a kitchen or just encourage our neighbor? Why am I anxious if you miss a service and no one knows why?
Why do I concern myself that you are having a hard time with your rent, or that another of you has a child in trouble, or that young person over there is in need of a mentor? Why do I care that your Aunt has cancer and wake myself early in the morning to pray for this stranger?
How can such a mishmash of weak human diversity ever be used of God or be useful in the kingdom of God?
What causes us to work together in any way, small or large, to affect any thing in God’s plan to find the hurting and the halt? We are all wholly ineffectual taken alone.
Unity.
We are all tied together by the hope within us. We are all seeking the same thing. We all want to find God in our lives everyday so that we can hear Him say “well done”. We gladly throw ourselves at His feet, right next to each other, elbow to elbow, so that we can find His presence in our lives. “Where two or three are gathered together…”
He gives the weak strength.
He giveth power to the faint; and to them that have no might he increaseth strength.
Even the youths shall faint and be weary, and the young men shall utterly fall:
But they that wait upon the LORD shall renew their strength; they shall mount up with
wings as eagles; they shall run, and not be weary; and they shall walk, and not faint. (Isa. 40:29-31)
Consider that each of us is so different. I am a small person with a small life; I am not powerful or terribly skilled and I have no inheritance on this Earth. I am limited in thinking ability and vision; even though I have tried to expand my horizons, I am terribly limited.
I look to my left or right and I see similar people, entirely similar yet different. We all hail from wildly different backgrounds and have tasted defeat and shame and maybe only a little success as far as our society would estimate. Many of us have had the test of time upon us and have failing parts connected in the same fashion, while others have yet to taste time and run around with boundless energy with no particularly useful point in mind.
I have skin of a particular type, while my brother standing next to me has another type. He likes certain types of food, and I appreciate another. My musical tastes are not really quite like yours, I am certain. In the workplace this demographic can lead to small and isolated groups who do not work effectively.
So what is it that makes me want to find my place next to you in a worship service, work along side you in the Spanish ministry, toil to help in a kitchen or just encourage our neighbor? Why am I anxious if you miss a service and no one knows why?
Why do I concern myself that you are having a hard time with your rent, or that another of you has a child in trouble, or that young person over there is in need of a mentor? Why do I care that your Aunt has cancer and wake myself early in the morning to pray for this stranger?
How can such a mishmash of weak human diversity ever be used of God or be useful in the kingdom of God?
What causes us to work together in any way, small or large, to affect any thing in God’s plan to find the hurting and the halt? We are all wholly ineffectual taken alone.
Unity.
We are all tied together by the hope within us. We are all seeking the same thing. We all want to find God in our lives everyday so that we can hear Him say “well done”. We gladly throw ourselves at His feet, right next to each other, elbow to elbow, so that we can find His presence in our lives. “Where two or three are gathered together…”
He gives the weak strength.
He giveth power to the faint; and to them that have no might he increaseth strength.
Even the youths shall faint and be weary, and the young men shall utterly fall:
But they that wait upon the LORD shall renew their strength; they shall mount up with
wings as eagles; they shall run, and not be weary; and they shall walk, and not faint. (Isa. 40:29-31)
Saturday, August 16, 2008
Inroducing...
Sunday, August 3, 2008
For I am become like a bottle in the smoke; yet do I not forget thy statutes. Psalms 119:83.
During the days of the ancients, when traveling across the wilderness in search of pasture or water, the family resided in a woven goat-hair facility; a tent. Several scriptural references resort to simile and analogy based on the tent. When God spoke to Isaiah in chapter 40 verse 22 he was alluding to the phenomenon of seeing star-like points of light in the roof in the daylight, just as the stars are arrayed in the outside sky at night. This passage uses the and as a way to connect two statements conveying the same idea. So the sentence after the semicolon is repeated using synonyms:
It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in:
The goat-hair weave of the tent roof would keep out water because the fibers swell when wet. The roof would allow ventilation when dry and this was important as well.
Drinking water, milk or wine was kept in a skin with one end plugged, usually by a small end of a horn or other hard material. When inside the family home, the bottle hung from a tent pole, and inside the tent was an open fire. Since the tent was made of woven goat hair, no chimney was used. Often the top part of the tent was filled with smoke from the fire.
The animal skin would, over time, pick up the residue of the smoke that would ruin the taste of the fluids kept inside. Eventually, the skin would shrivel up and harden, becoming useless.
The day comes when you also seem pretty much useless. Having a bad day is a fairly common event for the “grasshoppers” that inhabit the earth. In fact, God writes that He sees our inability and remembers we are just “dust”.
There are many who suffer physical debilitation because of accident and aging. Disease can turn you into a useless “water skin” as far as the eye can tell. David knows this well. His statement in the title passage tells about his experience with the impact of the decay of a human body.
Remember God’s statutes. God is faithful to remember them. One of those statutes is important to remember when you feel like a smoke damaged water skin.
Hast thou not known? hast thou not heard, that the everlasting God, the LORD, the Creator of the ends of the earth, fainteth not, neither is weary? there is no searching of his understanding.
He giveth power to the faint; and to them that have no might he increaseth strength. (Isaiah 40:28,29)
The Psalmist is telling of the ruin that all people will have in life, yet he is encouraging you to maintain your integrity with God and remember “In every thing give thanks: for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus concerning you.” Sometimes, at the weakest points in our life, God makes even a small smile from you blow open the doors of hope for some hapless “grasshopper” without a chance for help in the whole world, because you exert HIS strength.
During the days of the ancients, when traveling across the wilderness in search of pasture or water, the family resided in a woven goat-hair facility; a tent. Several scriptural references resort to simile and analogy based on the tent. When God spoke to Isaiah in chapter 40 verse 22 he was alluding to the phenomenon of seeing star-like points of light in the roof in the daylight, just as the stars are arrayed in the outside sky at night. This passage uses the and as a way to connect two statements conveying the same idea. So the sentence after the semicolon is repeated using synonyms:
It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in:
The goat-hair weave of the tent roof would keep out water because the fibers swell when wet. The roof would allow ventilation when dry and this was important as well.
Drinking water, milk or wine was kept in a skin with one end plugged, usually by a small end of a horn or other hard material. When inside the family home, the bottle hung from a tent pole, and inside the tent was an open fire. Since the tent was made of woven goat hair, no chimney was used. Often the top part of the tent was filled with smoke from the fire.
The animal skin would, over time, pick up the residue of the smoke that would ruin the taste of the fluids kept inside. Eventually, the skin would shrivel up and harden, becoming useless.
The day comes when you also seem pretty much useless. Having a bad day is a fairly common event for the “grasshoppers” that inhabit the earth. In fact, God writes that He sees our inability and remembers we are just “dust”.
There are many who suffer physical debilitation because of accident and aging. Disease can turn you into a useless “water skin” as far as the eye can tell. David knows this well. His statement in the title passage tells about his experience with the impact of the decay of a human body.
Remember God’s statutes. God is faithful to remember them. One of those statutes is important to remember when you feel like a smoke damaged water skin.
Hast thou not known? hast thou not heard, that the everlasting God, the LORD, the Creator of the ends of the earth, fainteth not, neither is weary? there is no searching of his understanding.
He giveth power to the faint; and to them that have no might he increaseth strength. (Isaiah 40:28,29)
The Psalmist is telling of the ruin that all people will have in life, yet he is encouraging you to maintain your integrity with God and remember “In every thing give thanks: for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus concerning you.” Sometimes, at the weakest points in our life, God makes even a small smile from you blow open the doors of hope for some hapless “grasshopper” without a chance for help in the whole world, because you exert HIS strength.
Friday, July 25, 2008
What, Wrong Already? Part 2
The Orthodox Church (founded in the book of Acts of the Apostles) suffered attack immediately upon its formation. The Apostles worked with the churches scattered about the region by writing epistles which included an effort to refute and warn against this heretical attack on the doctrine of the Apostles. Sound doctrine was established by these letters and they have in turn informed us of the proper message to follow. There is very little of that “Orthodox” Church left in the modern religious world today. Most of modern religion espouses a corrupted and heretical theology when compared to the text of the N.T. There are churches who claim they are “Orthodox”, but the meaning of that word defies the application. The leaven of the Pharisees has had it's effect through the age of Christianity.
Any change in the way God related to man over the ages was initiated by God and not by man. When a change occurs, we are informed by the Word of God and not the whim of man. Changes that will occur in the future have already been described in the Bible for us so that we may know what to expect and how to respond accordingly.
That the post-apostolic writers were writing after the ancient language concepts had fallen from common usage is clear in this regard. They were writing from a Greek translation of the Biblical texts of their time and in a more modern societal frame of reference. As they were clearly not inspired of God to write these things, which try to change how God and man are to interface, we can regard the post-apostolic era as a theologically error-ridden period in which the history of man changed the face of Christianity through Greco-Roman logic, and law but did not improve our understanding of the true nature of God. Jesus also criticized the Pharisees of adding to the word of God and destroying the original traditions of the law by the uninspired legal rationalizations of the written Talmudic tradition (the mishna is the oral tradition). A large part of the hatred by the ruling Jews for Christians was this disregard for their Talmudic and kabalistic tradition. In this present age, any group who promotes the fundamental Apostles doctrine in the original form is likewise brought into disrepute and hatred.
Careful examination of the apostolic creed (initially published by an African lawyer, Tertullian) produced during this era, and those creeds written after it, show no concrete language at all. The words used are all abstract and give no real understanding in any basic way of who God is. It has led to confusion and great strife, not only among Protestants and Catholics, but within the Jewish religious community and individuals of Islamic background as well. The Torah of the Jews is clearly and rigorously monotheistic.
The passages from the Quran referring to Christianity and Jesus Christ describe great conflict with a theological construct formed in this post-apostolic age of un-enlightenment, the doctrine of the Triune Godhead. Several passages describe Mary, the mother of Jesus Christ, as if she were considered part of a pantheon of a triune Godhead. The passages demand that Islam should disregard this status and proclaim that she is a mortal only and that there is only one God: “And when Allah will say: O Isa [Jesus] son of Marium [Mary]! Did you say to men, "Take me and my mother for two gods besides Allah?" He [Jesus] will say: "Glory be to you, it did not befit me that I should say what I had no right to say.”(5:116). This is because these words in the Quran were written down about 500 years after the apostolic age, and the community of Christians in the town where the author of this book lived were already beyond the monotheistic point of view of the Apostles and well on the way to a dogma of intercession by Mary and the Triune or composite Godhead based on certain details of the Gnostic heresy.
The Roman Emperor Constantine had made the Trinitarian Godhead theology into Roman law in 325 A.D., about 200 years before the Quran was written. Islam is a strictly monotheistic culture and cannot align the concept of the trinity with their understanding of a single, all-powerful God.
Interestingly, a well known atheist of the 19th century, Friedrich Nietzsche, complained in a published philosophical treatise written as a refutation of the Trinity, that modern Christians did not understand their own God. He was actually ridiculing his father, a Lutheran bishop who professed the Trinitarian doctrine, by pointing out the confusion generated by a non-Biblical discussion of God in terms of this logic. Even this nihilistic philosopher and atheist understood that the logic of the post-apostolic age was corrupt and cannot truly represent the Godhead of the Bible. Many people today suffer from the illusion of a God of multiple personalities or even that Jesus is a descendant of God somehow and part of a pantheon of god-like personalities because of this post-apostolic logical analysis of the incarnation.
In 1669, Isaac Newton was appointed Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at the University of England (now called Trinity) in Cambridge. As a requirement of that office, Isaac Newton had to be an ordained minister of the Anglican Church.
Typical of Isaac Newton’s method, he was unaware of the details of that office and so read up on it. After completing his historical study to his satisfaction, Newton was prepared to resign his position at the university as he objected to the doctrine of the Trinity. He writes, “The doctrine of the Trinity is a fraud, perpetrated by lawyers and bishops in the third and fourth centuries.” As Newton was a devout Christian, he was prepared to be dismissed for this intransigence against the Church. He remained in that position only because he received special dispensation for his view of the Trinity. The following is an excerpt from “Wikipedia” a public domain encyclopedia: “… However, the terms of the Lucasian professorship required that the holder not be active in the church (presumably so as to have more time for science). Newton argued that this should exempt him from the ordination requirement, and Charles II, whose permission was needed, accepted this argument. Thus a conflict between Newton's religious views and Anglican orthodoxy was averted.” Isaac Newton was arguably the greatest mathematical genius ever known to man and clearly a very great natural philosopher. He was also able to ignore the common theology of the day and find out for himself what history had to say on the matter of religion in general and doctrine in particular. This required no genius, but the determined effort of a curious person. A careful study of post-apostolic history will provide anyone the necessary information required to allow the same conclusion about the development and application of the trinity concept.
Against Heresy
The Apostle Paul warned that no one should believe any new doctrines taught after the Apostles doctrine of the N.T. church that was already established: “But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.” (Gal. 1:8) This was so important that it was given unusual emphasis by repeating the whole statement again. In Hebrew culture, repeating a statement is much like suggesting that the consequences of the statement are dire indeed. Paul is pointing out to the church Bishop that there will be no other acceptable gospel than that which had already been preached, and there will be no other doctrine that is acceptable for mankind if not identical with the Apostles doctrine preached in the book of the Acts. The gospel of salvation is not founded in any epistles of the N. T. and it was not preached to all men in the history of Jesus Christ found in Matthew, Mark, Luke, or John. That ministry was reserved for the Jewish nation only. Salvation’s plan for the Christian era was not revealed even in the forgiveness offered to the thief who was on the cross of crucifixion beside Jesus. Gospel salvation was preached to all men who seek entry into the kingdom of God only in the book of Acts in a plan following the words of Jesus requiring men to be born of the water and of the spirit. The post-apostolic modifications of N.T. theology are not acceptable, and to accept it, is to become accursed.
Any future changes in the relationship between man and God is carefully outlined in the Bible and does discuss the ending of the grace of God toward man. This change will occur just as God’s relationship with man changed at the flood, after the covenant with Abraham and after the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. We are to be prepared for that eventuality by accepting the grace of God now, for the change of this relationship with man is one of judgment. The wrath of God is turned from us at this time, but in the future sinful man will not be spared His wrath. The time for obedience to the plan of salvation to access the grace of God is now. The Bible declares that now is the day of salvation. (II Co. 6:2)
Passages in the Quran that refer to Jesus Christ:2:87; 2:136; 3:45-46; 3:54; 3:59; 4:156-58; 4:163; 4:171-72; 5:17; 5:46; 5:72-75; 5:110; 5:116; 9:30-31; 17:111; 19:20-22; 19:33-35; 19:88-92; 23:91; 43:59; 61:6; 61:14; 66:12; 2:253; 3:52; 3:84; 5:78; 23:50; 23:117; 33:7-8; 42:13; 43:57-64; 43:86; 57:27.
Any change in the way God related to man over the ages was initiated by God and not by man. When a change occurs, we are informed by the Word of God and not the whim of man. Changes that will occur in the future have already been described in the Bible for us so that we may know what to expect and how to respond accordingly.
That the post-apostolic writers were writing after the ancient language concepts had fallen from common usage is clear in this regard. They were writing from a Greek translation of the Biblical texts of their time and in a more modern societal frame of reference. As they were clearly not inspired of God to write these things, which try to change how God and man are to interface, we can regard the post-apostolic era as a theologically error-ridden period in which the history of man changed the face of Christianity through Greco-Roman logic, and law but did not improve our understanding of the true nature of God. Jesus also criticized the Pharisees of adding to the word of God and destroying the original traditions of the law by the uninspired legal rationalizations of the written Talmudic tradition (the mishna is the oral tradition). A large part of the hatred by the ruling Jews for Christians was this disregard for their Talmudic and kabalistic tradition. In this present age, any group who promotes the fundamental Apostles doctrine in the original form is likewise brought into disrepute and hatred.
Careful examination of the apostolic creed (initially published by an African lawyer, Tertullian) produced during this era, and those creeds written after it, show no concrete language at all. The words used are all abstract and give no real understanding in any basic way of who God is. It has led to confusion and great strife, not only among Protestants and Catholics, but within the Jewish religious community and individuals of Islamic background as well. The Torah of the Jews is clearly and rigorously monotheistic.
The passages from the Quran referring to Christianity and Jesus Christ describe great conflict with a theological construct formed in this post-apostolic age of un-enlightenment, the doctrine of the Triune Godhead. Several passages describe Mary, the mother of Jesus Christ, as if she were considered part of a pantheon of a triune Godhead. The passages demand that Islam should disregard this status and proclaim that she is a mortal only and that there is only one God: “And when Allah will say: O Isa [Jesus] son of Marium [Mary]! Did you say to men, "Take me and my mother for two gods besides Allah?" He [Jesus] will say: "Glory be to you, it did not befit me that I should say what I had no right to say.”(5:116). This is because these words in the Quran were written down about 500 years after the apostolic age, and the community of Christians in the town where the author of this book lived were already beyond the monotheistic point of view of the Apostles and well on the way to a dogma of intercession by Mary and the Triune or composite Godhead based on certain details of the Gnostic heresy.
The Roman Emperor Constantine had made the Trinitarian Godhead theology into Roman law in 325 A.D., about 200 years before the Quran was written. Islam is a strictly monotheistic culture and cannot align the concept of the trinity with their understanding of a single, all-powerful God.
Interestingly, a well known atheist of the 19th century, Friedrich Nietzsche, complained in a published philosophical treatise written as a refutation of the Trinity, that modern Christians did not understand their own God. He was actually ridiculing his father, a Lutheran bishop who professed the Trinitarian doctrine, by pointing out the confusion generated by a non-Biblical discussion of God in terms of this logic. Even this nihilistic philosopher and atheist understood that the logic of the post-apostolic age was corrupt and cannot truly represent the Godhead of the Bible. Many people today suffer from the illusion of a God of multiple personalities or even that Jesus is a descendant of God somehow and part of a pantheon of god-like personalities because of this post-apostolic logical analysis of the incarnation.
In 1669, Isaac Newton was appointed Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at the University of England (now called Trinity) in Cambridge. As a requirement of that office, Isaac Newton had to be an ordained minister of the Anglican Church.
Typical of Isaac Newton’s method, he was unaware of the details of that office and so read up on it. After completing his historical study to his satisfaction, Newton was prepared to resign his position at the university as he objected to the doctrine of the Trinity. He writes, “The doctrine of the Trinity is a fraud, perpetrated by lawyers and bishops in the third and fourth centuries.” As Newton was a devout Christian, he was prepared to be dismissed for this intransigence against the Church. He remained in that position only because he received special dispensation for his view of the Trinity. The following is an excerpt from “Wikipedia” a public domain encyclopedia: “… However, the terms of the Lucasian professorship required that the holder not be active in the church (presumably so as to have more time for science). Newton argued that this should exempt him from the ordination requirement, and Charles II, whose permission was needed, accepted this argument. Thus a conflict between Newton's religious views and Anglican orthodoxy was averted.” Isaac Newton was arguably the greatest mathematical genius ever known to man and clearly a very great natural philosopher. He was also able to ignore the common theology of the day and find out for himself what history had to say on the matter of religion in general and doctrine in particular. This required no genius, but the determined effort of a curious person. A careful study of post-apostolic history will provide anyone the necessary information required to allow the same conclusion about the development and application of the trinity concept.
Against Heresy
The Apostle Paul warned that no one should believe any new doctrines taught after the Apostles doctrine of the N.T. church that was already established: “But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.” (Gal. 1:8) This was so important that it was given unusual emphasis by repeating the whole statement again. In Hebrew culture, repeating a statement is much like suggesting that the consequences of the statement are dire indeed. Paul is pointing out to the church Bishop that there will be no other acceptable gospel than that which had already been preached, and there will be no other doctrine that is acceptable for mankind if not identical with the Apostles doctrine preached in the book of the Acts. The gospel of salvation is not founded in any epistles of the N. T. and it was not preached to all men in the history of Jesus Christ found in Matthew, Mark, Luke, or John. That ministry was reserved for the Jewish nation only. Salvation’s plan for the Christian era was not revealed even in the forgiveness offered to the thief who was on the cross of crucifixion beside Jesus. Gospel salvation was preached to all men who seek entry into the kingdom of God only in the book of Acts in a plan following the words of Jesus requiring men to be born of the water and of the spirit. The post-apostolic modifications of N.T. theology are not acceptable, and to accept it, is to become accursed.
Any future changes in the relationship between man and God is carefully outlined in the Bible and does discuss the ending of the grace of God toward man. This change will occur just as God’s relationship with man changed at the flood, after the covenant with Abraham and after the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. We are to be prepared for that eventuality by accepting the grace of God now, for the change of this relationship with man is one of judgment. The wrath of God is turned from us at this time, but in the future sinful man will not be spared His wrath. The time for obedience to the plan of salvation to access the grace of God is now. The Bible declares that now is the day of salvation. (II Co. 6:2)
Passages in the Quran that refer to Jesus Christ:2:87; 2:136; 3:45-46; 3:54; 3:59; 4:156-58; 4:163; 4:171-72; 5:17; 5:46; 5:72-75; 5:110; 5:116; 9:30-31; 17:111; 19:20-22; 19:33-35; 19:88-92; 23:91; 43:59; 61:6; 61:14; 66:12; 2:253; 3:52; 3:84; 5:78; 23:50; 23:117; 33:7-8; 42:13; 43:57-64; 43:86; 57:27.
Saturday, July 19, 2008
What, Wrong Already? Part 1
Jesus Christ warned the disciples of a problem they would face from the current Jewish leadership. In Matthew 16:6, the voice of Jesus was recorded as saying “beware the leaven of the Pharisees!” What could this mean? The N.T. has a number of passages that refer to a doctrinal deviation called Gnosticism. This word, gnosis, is a Greek word that means literally “science”. The Gnostic heresy in Christianity is in reality a product of Jewish Kabalistic theology which emphasizes a non-human Messiah, asceticism, circumcision, monasticism, and Trinitarian relationships in the spiritual realm. Additionally, contact with God was to take place through a series of intermediates and not directly from human to God. These characteristic practices derive from a single point source in time and geography.
Timothy was warned by the Apostle Paul to avoid this type of speculation “O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings and oppositions of science falsely, so called.”(I Tim. 6:20). The Greek word for babbling is related to the Hebrew word tsaphaph translated as peeping (to whisper) and a related word, hagah translated as muttering (to murmur), in the O.T. Reference to this word relates to the idolatry of Israelites who followed the tradition of muttering to themselves to impress others with their skills of the divination of sprits:
And when they shall say unto you, Seek unto them that have familiar spirits, and unto wizards that peep, and that mutter: should not a people seek unto their God? for the living to the dead? (Isaiah 8:19)
One of the key practices other than worship and manipulation of Angels and spirits is the use of science-like but incorrect concepts to rationalize the spiritual world, including the heavens. According to Louis Berkhof, in his “History of Christian Doctrines”, this heresy of Christianity was a form of Jewish Christianity that was marked by theosophic speculations and strict asceticism. Further, he says that magic and astrology were practiced among them.” See also (Col 2:16-18).
Since Gnosticism held that the Messiah was not a human being, a warning was written to the those of the Christian faith of this theological feature as well: “And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.” (I John 4:3). Clearly Gnosticism is an early heretical deviation of the early church.
Berkhof continues to discuss Jewish kabalism in that all schools of Christian Gnosticism were headed by Jewish scholars, and that Jewish kabalism underwent a morphological change into Christian Gnosticism. He refers to a strange mixture of Jewish and Christian doctrines as well as speculative heathen thought. This has been noted by others who recorded the history of Gnostic beginnings from Jewish Kabalism: The Jewish Encyclopedia, all editions; The Encyclopedia Britannica, 10th ed. 1910; Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma.
In his book “Israel, our duty our dilemma” Ted Pike writes of the effect of this influence: “If Gnosticism, then, is a Jewish creation as the Jewish Encyclopedia insists, we are forced to conclude that the Pharisees introduced an element of confusion into Christian theology which we still have not emerged from”. The connection with Babylon is important as the triune gods of the Hindu religion were dominant there during the Jewish captivity. In fact, many triads of spiritual entities exist within the ancient religions springing from history at this time in Babylon. The only exception to this was the monotheistic Israelites who were part of the ten percent of the nation that was released from captivity. Of this fraction, a number were very much influenced by the heathen religious world of Babylon and eventually developed in to the kabalistic movement.
As it turns out, the Pharisees are those who practiced kabalistic theology in the time of the Messiah on Earth. This is why they were the bitter enemies of Jesus Christ. They also held that The Messiah would not be a man, but a spirit transformed as some non-corporeal entity. When Jesus claimed to be the Messiah, He was throwing doubt on their particular view of the spiritual universe.
It seems clear that a reference to Babylon the Great in the book of Revelations is focused on this point of heresy: “And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.” (Rev. 17:5) This reference to a harlot is the phraseology of the O.T. when speaking of the problem of Israel falling into false religion, i.e. the whoredoms of Israel. Clearly, false religion is related to the city of Babylon, the ancient home of the captive Jews, and the spawning ground of false perceptions of God.
Timothy was warned by the Apostle Paul to avoid this type of speculation “O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings and oppositions of science falsely, so called.”(I Tim. 6:20). The Greek word for babbling is related to the Hebrew word tsaphaph translated as peeping (to whisper) and a related word, hagah translated as muttering (to murmur), in the O.T. Reference to this word relates to the idolatry of Israelites who followed the tradition of muttering to themselves to impress others with their skills of the divination of sprits:
And when they shall say unto you, Seek unto them that have familiar spirits, and unto wizards that peep, and that mutter: should not a people seek unto their God? for the living to the dead? (Isaiah 8:19)
One of the key practices other than worship and manipulation of Angels and spirits is the use of science-like but incorrect concepts to rationalize the spiritual world, including the heavens. According to Louis Berkhof, in his “History of Christian Doctrines”, this heresy of Christianity was a form of Jewish Christianity that was marked by theosophic speculations and strict asceticism. Further, he says that magic and astrology were practiced among them.” See also (Col 2:16-18).
Since Gnosticism held that the Messiah was not a human being, a warning was written to the those of the Christian faith of this theological feature as well: “And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.” (I John 4:3). Clearly Gnosticism is an early heretical deviation of the early church.
Berkhof continues to discuss Jewish kabalism in that all schools of Christian Gnosticism were headed by Jewish scholars, and that Jewish kabalism underwent a morphological change into Christian Gnosticism. He refers to a strange mixture of Jewish and Christian doctrines as well as speculative heathen thought. This has been noted by others who recorded the history of Gnostic beginnings from Jewish Kabalism: The Jewish Encyclopedia, all editions; The Encyclopedia Britannica, 10th ed. 1910; Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma.
In his book “Israel, our duty our dilemma” Ted Pike writes of the effect of this influence: “If Gnosticism, then, is a Jewish creation as the Jewish Encyclopedia insists, we are forced to conclude that the Pharisees introduced an element of confusion into Christian theology which we still have not emerged from”. The connection with Babylon is important as the triune gods of the Hindu religion were dominant there during the Jewish captivity. In fact, many triads of spiritual entities exist within the ancient religions springing from history at this time in Babylon. The only exception to this was the monotheistic Israelites who were part of the ten percent of the nation that was released from captivity. Of this fraction, a number were very much influenced by the heathen religious world of Babylon and eventually developed in to the kabalistic movement.
As it turns out, the Pharisees are those who practiced kabalistic theology in the time of the Messiah on Earth. This is why they were the bitter enemies of Jesus Christ. They also held that The Messiah would not be a man, but a spirit transformed as some non-corporeal entity. When Jesus claimed to be the Messiah, He was throwing doubt on their particular view of the spiritual universe.
It seems clear that a reference to Babylon the Great in the book of Revelations is focused on this point of heresy: “And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.” (Rev. 17:5) This reference to a harlot is the phraseology of the O.T. when speaking of the problem of Israel falling into false religion, i.e. the whoredoms of Israel. Clearly, false religion is related to the city of Babylon, the ancient home of the captive Jews, and the spawning ground of false perceptions of God.
Labels:
Babylon the Great,
Gnosticism,
heresy,
Kabalistic
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
